Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04887
Original file (BC 2013 04887.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:
		 DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04887
			 COUNSEL:  NONE
			 HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her late spouse’s record be changed to show he elected spouse 
coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan 
(RCSBP).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She is listed as beneficiary on all of her late husband’s 
benefits.  She cannot imagine not being listed as beneficiary 
for his retirement benefits as well.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, she provides a personal 
statement, retirement certificate, death certificate, and other 
related documentation.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 15 February 1994, the decedent became eligible for retired 
pay at age 60.

The decedent died on 21 February 2000 at the age of 46.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTT recommends approval.  DPTT states when a member 
becomes eligible for retired pay at age 60, a notification 
letter along with an RCSBP information package is sent by 
certified mail.  In accordance with U.S.C. Title 10 Subsection 
1448, “A member who is married or has a dependent child and who 
received notice of eligibility for retired pay and elects to 
participate in the plan and makes a designation before the end 
of the 90-day period beginning on the date he receives such 
notification.”  ARPC has no record of the member making an RCSBP 
election in response to the letter sent; therefore, he was 
automatically enrolled in Option A, “Decline to Make an Election 
Until Age 60.”  He was married with dependent children at the 
time of the automatic election.

The former service member’s record does not have a certified 
mail-card receipt for a delivered RCSBP information letter.  
However, an automatic election was updated in his record.

At the time of the service member’s death, the RCSBP annuity was 
not afforded to his survivors because he was not participating 
in the Plan.

The complete DPTT evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 2 May 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error and injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the circumstances of this case, the 
majority of the Board believes that favorable consideration of 
the applicant's request is warranted.  We note that ARPC has 
indicated there is no record of the former service member making 
an RCSBP election.  Additionally, ARPC also indicates there is 
no record of a certified mail-card receipt for a delivered RCSBP 
information letter.  As such, the Board majority believes the 
decedent was deprived of the opportunity to make an RCSBP 
election and therefore a victim of an error and injustice.  As 
such, the majority of the Board recommends the records be 
corrected as indicated below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to FORMER MEMBER, be corrected to show that:

	a.  On 15 February 1994, he made a timely and effective 
election of spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan, 
based on full retired pay; and 

	b.  On 22 February 2000, APPLICANT, submitted a timely and 
effective claim for a survivor benefit annuity.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-04887 in Executive Session on 27 June 2014, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


By a majority vote, the Board recommended approval of the 
application.  XXXXXXXXXXx  voted to deny the applicant’s request 
but does not desire to submit a minority report.  The following 
documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 October 2013, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPTT, dated 19 December 2013, w/atch.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 May 2014.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01612

    Original file (BC 2014 01612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01612 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be designated as beneficiary for “former spouse” coverage under the decedent’s Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant was awarded full survivor benefit annuity under RCSBP by court order. However, the applicant did not notify ARPC of her RCSBP election within one year as prescribed by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00112

    Original file (BC 2014 00112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records indicate that he did not elect to participate during these timeframes. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00961

    Original file (BC-2013-00961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She made several inquiries in regards to the decedent’s elected survivor benefits, only to be told each time that she was not eligible due to his type of retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the decedent was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02769

    Original file (BC 2013 02769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IAW U.S.C., Title 10, Subsection 1448(a)(2)(B), “A person who is eligible to participate in the plan and who is married or has a dependent child when he is notified that he has completed the years of service required for eligibility for reserve-component retired pay, and elects to participate in the plan by designation before the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date he receives such notification.” DPTT’s system confirms the applicant reported her husband’s death to ARPC on 28 March...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00961

    Original file (BC 2013 00961.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She made several inquiries in regards to the decedent’s elected survivor benefits, only to be told each time that she was not eligible due to his type of retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, indicating the decedent was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00793

    Original file (BC-2011-00793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 Aug 1994, the decedent and the applicant divorced. If the documents were provided within the required timeframe, DPTT would have been unable to update the member's RCSBP election due to the member not electing to participate in the Plan when eligible. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In further support of her request, the applicant provides two letters.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01662

    Original file (BC-2013-01662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant and the decedent divorced on 25 June 2010. The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. The divorce decree did not award former spouse coverage under the RCSBP as dictated by law.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03477

    Original file (BC 2013 03477.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03477 MEMBER: (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE APPLICANT: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s record be corrected to show that his Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election was option C “immediate annuity for spouse and child(ren),” rather that option A, “decline to make an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03261

    Original file (BC 2013 03261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Congress declared two RCSBP Open Enrollment Seasons from 1 March 1999 through 29 February 2000 and 1 October 2005 through 30 September 2006. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00395

    Original file (BC-2012-00395.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00395 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased spouse’s record be changed to show he elected spouse and child coverage under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). A preponderance of the evidence provided supports that the applicant’s medical condition more likely than...